Statement for Dartmouth MDF Committee on Extreme Behaviors, Alex Barnett 8/8/14 Much research that informs this statement was done while serving on the Committee on Student Life and the Committee on Organization and Policy; I have shared this with these committees and with President Hanlon. The student social scene at Dartmouth is dominated, and increasingly so, by the Greek houses, whose members devote a tremendous amount of energy to recruiting new members and preserving traditions from a time before coeducation. Many of these traditions are homophobic, psychologically damaging (in the case of hazing and other gang-like extreme behaviors), and focus on secrecy, loyalty, hierarchy, ritualized drinking, vomiting, and denigration of women [1]. It is hard to think of anything more antithetical to our supposed core values. The houses hold power because of many factors including a lack of accountability, unregulated access to free alcohol, and a lack of other residential community and good social/party spaces. The research is extensive and very clear. Sorority members are three times more likely than those in off-campus housing to be raped while drunk [2]; fraternity men use significantly more coercive sexual strategies [3] and in one study [4] were three times more likely to rape than other students. Greek membership is the strongest predictor for alcohol abuse, with 86% binge drinkers nationally [5]. Gender segregation and social status anxiety are strong contributors to rape [6]; the Greek system promotes both, among an already ambitious student body (students speak of "social capital"). Local cultural factors play a huge role, yet the tradition-preserving mission of Greek organizations seems designed to prevent cultural change from within. The Greek system also maintains campus segregation by class, race and sexual orientation, and attracts a certain kind of reactionary student to attend the college. Dartmouth does not have an image problem: it has a real problem. So, what are the priorities for change? The Greek system must be eliminated, or, at the very least be made non-exclusive, local, co-ed (banning gender discrimination), and alcohol-regulated, which will have a similar effect. This cannot be done in small measures. If this well-endowed private institution cannot make this change, in the current climate, knowing what we all know, then we in fact do not care about the safety and inclusivity of our future students. In parallel, a massive investment is needed in residential life clusters (eg a house system including faculty families, and randomized housing assignment that promotes diversity rather than self-selected homogeneity), social programming (student-run music and party spaces, booking big acts of interest to students not retirees), and college bars / hang-out spaces. Such examples that need to be multiplied tenfold include: Friday Night Rock, Hopkins Garage, the Thugz Institute of Science. We also need to more aggressively and publicly expel students for crimes such as rape, hazing, and cyber-harassment (eg B@B), all of which remain epidemic and largely protected from the law. We must grow effective programs such as Mentors Against Violence (which, unlike DBI, includes peer cultural factors), and keenly collect and publicly release crime, health, and survey data rather than relying on secrecy and guesswork (my attempts to get such local data usually hit a brick wall). [1] P. Martin and R. Hummer, "Fraternities and Rape on Campus", Gender and Society 3(4) (1989) 457-473. [2] M. Mohler-Kuo, G. Dowdall, M. Koss, and H. Wechsler. "Correlates of Rape While Intoxicated in a National Sample of College Women." J. Stud. Alcohol. 65. (2004): 37-45. [3] K. A. Tyler, D.R. Hoyt and L.B. Whitbeck. (1998). Coercive Sexual Strategies, Violence and Victims, 13(1), 47-61. [4] J. Foubert, J. Newberry and J. Tatum, "Behavior Differences Seven Months Later: Effects of a Rape Prevention Program", NASPA J. 44(4) (2007) 728-749. [5] H. Wechsler, H. Kuh, A. Davenport, "Fraternities, Sororities and Binge Drinking: Results from a National Study of American Colleges," NASPA J. 46(3) (2009) 395-416. [6] E. Armstrong et al, "Sexual Assault on Campus: A Multilevel, Integrative Approach to Party Rape," Social Problems 53(4) (2006) 483-499. The references are eye-opening reading; see other references and notes at http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~ahb/studentlife